The Bible (in the verse indicated in this post’s title) says that “was has been will be again, what has been done will be done again, there is nothing new under the sun.” These days, even people who aren’t familiar with the Bible will sometimes be heard saying, “There’s nothing new under the sun.” This, especially when paired with other parts of the Bible, could be supportive of dharmic notions like karma and reincarnation. Strangely, one thing Christians are usually pretty certain about is that their dharma is not only supreme among belief systems but also is supremely unique – surely in direct conflict with things indicated in their own holy text.
As Hinduism is pretty much the oldest living religion today, it’s probably not unfair to say that most other religious or spiritual paths possibly derive from Hinduism, and if they don’t directly derive from it they are almost certainly influenced by it. If you disagree with this idea, try to think of an example of anything – anything at all – that wasn’t in some way affected or influenced by what came before it – and the effect or influence seen is usually more pronounced, I think, when what came before is of similar nature. For instance, the way houses are built now is directly influenced by the way houses were built long ago.
However, I came across an article recently that does well at pointing to just a few elements of the Christian faith that are either certainly from Hinduism or are almost certainly from Hinduism. I’m sharing a link to the article here and I am including the full text below as well. An errors found below are my own and I apologize for these typos.
To be clear, the truth of this isn’t to say that other paths are less valid or are incomplete or are actually “Hindu” paths (regardless of what some opinions might be) or even to suggest that anyone owes Hinduism anything – except perhaps respect and recognition. Someone else being right doesn’t mean you are wrong anymore than having a parent means you’re less of an individual. And someone or something else having an influence on you doesn’t mean you are less valid or independent.
Aum Shri Mahaganeshaya Namaha |Aum Shanti
You may find it surprising that much of Christianity originated from India. Indeed, over the centuries, numerous historians and sages have pointed out that not only has Hinduism had a predominant influence on Christianity, but that many of the Christian rites could be directly borrowed from Hindu ( Vedic ) India.
French historian Alain Danielou had noticed as early as 1950 that “a great number of events which surround the birth of Christ – as it is related in the Gospels – strangely reminded us of Buddha’s and Krishna’s legends.” Danielou quotes as examples the structure of the Christian Church, which resembles that of the Buddhist Chaitya; the rigorous asceticism of certain early Christian sects, which reminds one of the asceticism of Jain and Buddhist saints; the veneration of relics, the usage of holy water, which is an Indian practice, and the word “Amen,” which comes from the Hindu (Sanskrit) “OM.”
Another historian, Belgium’s Konraad Elst, also remarks “that many early Christian saints, such as Hippolytus of Rome, possessed an intimate knowledge of Brahmanism.” Elst even quotes the famous Saint Augustine who wrote: “We never cease to look toward India, where many things are proposed to our admiration.”
“Unfortunately”, remarks American Indianist David Frawley, “from the second century onward, Christian leaders decided to break away from the Hindu influence and show that Christianity only started with the birth of Christ.” Hence, many later saints began branding Brahmins as “heretics,” and Saint Gregory set a future trend by publicly destroying the “pagan” idols of the Hindus.
Great Indian sages, such as Sri Aurobindo and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, the founder of the Art of Living, have often remarked that the stories recounting how Jesus came to India to be initiated are probably true. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar notes, for instance, that Jesus sometimes wore an orange robe, the Hindu symbol of renunciation of the world, which was not a usual practice in Judaism. “In the same way,” he continues, “the worshiping of Virgin Mary in Catholicism is probably borrowed from the Hindu cult of the Devi.” Bells too, which cannot be found in Synagogues, the surviving form of Judaism, are used in church – and we all know their importance in Buddhism and Hinduism for thousands of years, even up to the present day.
There are many other similarities between Hinduism and Christianity, including the use of incense, sacred bread (prasadam), the different altars around churches (which recall the manifolddeities in their niches inside Hindu temples), reciting prayers on the rosary (Vedic japamala), the Christian Trinity (the ancient Vedic trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva as the creator, maintainer and destroyer respectively, as well as Lord Krishna as the Supreme Lord, the all-pervading Brahman as the holy ghost, and Paramatma as the expansion or son of the Lord), Christian processions, and the use of the sign of the cross (anganyasa), and so many others.
In fact, Hinduism’s pervading influence seems to go much earlier than Christianity. American mathematician, A. Seindenberg, has, for example, show that the Shulbasutras, the ancient Vedic science of mathematics, constitute the source of mathematics in the antique world of Babylon to Greece: “The arithmetic equations of the Shulbasutras were used in observance of the triangle by the Babylonians as well as in the edification of Egyptian pyramids, in particular, the funeral altar in the form of pyramid known in the Vedic world as smasana-cit.”
In astronomy too, the “Indus” (from the valley of the Indus) have left a universal legacy, determining for instance the dates of solstices, as noted by the 18th century French astronomer Jean Sylvain Bailly: “The movement of stars which was calculated by Hindus 4,500 years ago, does not differ even by a minute from the tables which we are using today.” And he concludes: “The Hindu systems of astronomy are much more ancient than those of the Egyptians – even the Jews derive from the Hindus their knowledge.”
There is also no doubt that the Greeks heavily borrowed from the “Indus.” Danielou notes that the Greek cult of Dionysus, which later became Bacchus with the Romans, is a branch of Shaivism: “Greeks spoke of India as the sacred territory of Dionysus, and even historians of Alexander the Great identified the Indian Shiva with Dionysys and mention the dates and legends of the Puranas.” French philosopher and Le Monde journalist Jean-Paul Droit recently wrote in his book, The Forgetfulness of India, that “Greeks loved so much Indian philosophy that Demetrios Galianos had even translated the Bhagavad-gita.”
Many Western and Christian historians have tried to nullify this India influence on Christian and ancient Greece by saying that it is the West through the Aryan invasion, and later the onslaught of Alexander the Great of India, which influenced Indian astronomy, mathematics, architecture, philosophy – and not vice versa. But new archeological and linguistic discoveries have proved that there never was an Aryan invasion and that there is a continuity from the ancient Vedic civilization to the Saraswati culture.
The Vedas, for instance, which constitute the soul of present day Hinduism, have not been composed in 1500 B.C., as Max Muller arbitrarily decided, but may go back to 7000 years before Christ, giving Hinduism plenty of time to influence Christianity and older civilizations which preceded Christianity.
Thus, we should be aware of and point out the close links which exits between Christianity and Hinduism (ancient Vedic culture), which bind them into a sacred brotherhood. Conscientious Christian and Western scholars can realize how the world humanity’s basic culture is Vedic through proper research.